Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 116% (1665MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +859%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A5500 +1642%
5105
Quadro K5200
293
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
10240
Shading Units
2304
320
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
48
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy