NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500
+4552%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
10240
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
