NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1687MHz vs 1260MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+116%
18.71 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Ampere-MW
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
20
7424
Shading Units
2560
232
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
80
58
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
22 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
