NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1404MHz vs 1260MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+271%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
14
7424
Shading Units
1792
232
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
64
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
22 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
