NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+4231%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
5
7424
Shading Units
240
232
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
32
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
