Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1291MHz vs 1260MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +529%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
9
7424
Shading Units
1152
232
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
32
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
22 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net