NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+2452%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
