NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
3840 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1395MHz vs 1260MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+87%
18.71 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Ampere-MW
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
56
7424
Shading Units
3584
232
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
64
232
Tensor Cores
448
58
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
