Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1537MHz
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile +372%
6.296 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

832 MHz
Base Clock
-
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

73.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy