NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1537MHz
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
+372%
6.296 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
832 MHz
Base Clock
-
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
