NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1815MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000
+103%
11.15 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Quadro RTX 5000
+304%
10638
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
2048
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
64
Tensor Cores
384
16
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
