Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1950MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +36%
5.468 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net