NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1480MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+80%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Quadro P2000
+13%
2973
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
8
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
