NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1335MHz vs 784MHz)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+159%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded
+79%
2628
Quadro K4200
1465
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
