NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+645%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
