NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500
+4034%
23.65 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1050 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
