NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1612MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile
+113%
17.66 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A4500 Mobile
+33%
2676
RTX A2000 Embedded
2001
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Mobile
+22%
332
RTX A2000 Embedded
271
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
20
5888
Shading Units
2560
184
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
80
46
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
392 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
