Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile +4917%
17.66 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
128
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

140W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy