Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (140W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2100MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile
17.66 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +825%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
5888
Shading Units
19456
184
TMUs
880
96
ROPs
0
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
146 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

140W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy