Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +525%
14.31 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
1536
184
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy