Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H +23%
19.17 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
256
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
22 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net