NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1762MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+13%
2.706 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Nov 2020
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
