NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+2906%
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G96C
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
