NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+125%
2.706 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
