NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+333%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Feb 2012
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
480
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
