NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+102%
7.987 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
2688
104
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
48
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GK110
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
