NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+676%
7.987 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
14
3328
Shading Units
448
104
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
238W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GF100
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
