NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1545MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+18%
9.492 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000
5936
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+54%
9149
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
48
3328
Shading Units
3072
104
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
104
Tensor Cores
384
26
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
TU104B
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
