NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1395MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+25%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
56
3328
Shading Units
3584
104
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
104
Tensor Cores
448
26
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
TU102
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
