NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+30619%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
2
3328
Shading Units
16
104
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
G86
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
