NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (95W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1733MHz vs 1687MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
+2%
8.873 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
4917
Quadro P5000
+28%
6335
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000 Mobile
2836
Quadro P5000
+2%
2900
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2016
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
20
2560
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
180W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
