NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1687MHz vs 1252MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1247%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
+703%
4917
Quadro P400
612
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1346%
2836
Quadro P400
196
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Mobile
+833%
84
Quadro P400
9
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
256
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
