NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1687MHz vs 1404MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+71%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Mobile
+207%
1222
Quadro P3200 Max Q
397
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Mobile
84
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+1%
85
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
