NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5400M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+2342%
6.18 TFLOPS
NVS 5400M
0.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
N13P-NS1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
