NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5600
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+5050%
6.18 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5600
0.12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Ampere-MW
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
M76
-
GPU Variant
M76 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
