Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +599%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.80 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-GTX-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net