NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M5100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1207MHz vs 775MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+522%
6.18 TFLOPS
FirePro M5100
0.992 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.40 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.00 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
992.0 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Venus
-
GPU Variant
Venus XT
(216-0846000)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
