NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1612MHz vs 1443MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+458%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro P620 Mobile
1.478 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
1177 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1443 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.09 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.18 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.09 GFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1478 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
46.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
