Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +2094%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.02 billion
Unknown
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net