NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+5058%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
64
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
