NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1686%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
