Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1816MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 168GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
9.3 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +48%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

652 MHz
Base Clock
-
1816 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
7680
80
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

87.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
145.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
9.3 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy