Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded +400%
6.664 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy