Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +971%
92.15 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2175 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
18176
Shading Units
4096
568
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
64
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Fiji
AD102
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy