NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+4346%
91.06 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Jul 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1024
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
64
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
