NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+7087%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
768
568
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
AD102
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
