Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S10

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S10

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM MTT S10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S10 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +4346%
91.06 TFLOPS
MTT S10
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Oct 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
142
SM Count
18176
Shading Units
1024
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
64
568
Tensor Cores
142
RT Cores
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102
GPU Variant
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net