NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 3100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 512MB VRAM NVS 3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+69453%
32.69 TFLOPS
NVS 3100M
0.047 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
2
9728
Shading Units
16
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-NS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
