NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1680MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+1861%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
720 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
14
9728
Shading Units
896
304
TMUs
56
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.76 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.333 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.667 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
