NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+58204%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
1
3840
Shading Units
8
240
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
12W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
G98
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
