NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+2659%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2010
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
8
3840
Shading Units
256
240
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
142W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GF100
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
